Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Ivy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1921No. 9869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; J. W. Bolen, Judge. In the matter of the estate of Louis H. Ivy, deceased. Prom judgment affirming allowance of claim for burial expenses, C. Dale Wolfe, administrator, brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, j.

On February 10, 1916, C. P. Wallace was appointed administrator' of the estate of Louis H. Ivy, deceased, and on February 21, 1916, gave notice to creditors to present their claims. On the 27th day of February, 1916, the Eureka Undertaking Company of Okmulgee presented its claim to the- administrator amounting to $193.62 for burial expenses, as follows: $150 for casket and $43.62 for embalming; and on said date C. P. Wallace, the administrator, indorsed upon the claim that the same was allowed. On the 5th day of May, 1916, the county court heard evidence regarding said claim, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Barnett's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Caulfield v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Osborn v. ForesytheSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Husted v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. MadiganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Harris v. Spurrier Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. L. E. Myers Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Hatcher v. Wade's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API