Legal Opinion

Ormsby v. Capital Welding, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2004No. Docket 123287, 123289PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider the relationship between the “common work area doctrine” and the “retained control doctrine,” and to address the scope of each doctrine. At common law, property owners and general contractors generally could not be held liable for the negligence of independent subcontractors and their employees. In Funk v Gen Motors Corp, 392 Mich 91, 104-105; 220 NW2d 641 (1974),1 however, this Court set forth a new exception to this general rule of nonliability, holding that, under certain circumstances, a general contractor could be held liable under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Groncki v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Healing Place at North Oakland Medical Center v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Ghaffari v. Turner Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API