Legal Opinion

Catalyst Managerial Services v. Libya Africa Investment Portfolio

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 23, 2017No. 16-2653-cvUnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Intervenor Libya Africa Investment Portfolio (“LAP”) appeals from the district court’s grant of Catalyst Management Services, DMCC’s (“CMS”) petition for judicial assistance pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a), authorizing CMS to compel document discovery from sixteen banks for use in a wrongful-contract-termination proceeding brought by CMS against LAP in the United Kingdom. Because the district court determined, and the parties do not dispute, that the statutory requirements for § 1782 relief were met, we review the district court’s decision for abuse of discretion, see…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Mees v. BuiterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Euromepa, S.A. v. R. Esmerian, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Brandi-Dohrn v. IKB DEUTSCHE INDUSTRIEBANK AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. In The Matter Of The Application Of Malev Hungarian Airlines, PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Gallego v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  3. Hybrid Athletics, LLC v. Hylete, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  4. Hybrid Athletics, LLC v. Hylete, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  5. IN RE APPLICATION OF THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING DISCOVERY FROM GREGORY MCGRATH PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API