Legal Opinion

Hybrid Athletics, LLC v. Hylete, LLC

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 30, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01767Unknown

1Opinion

FOURN TITHEED D SITSATRTEICST D OISFT CROICNTN CEOCTUIRCTU T HYBRID ATHLETICS, LLC, Plaintiff, No. 3:17-cv-1767 (VAB) v. consolidated with No. 3:19-cv-595 (VAB) HYLETE, LLC, HYLETE, INC., No. 3:19-cv-596 (VAB) RONALD L. WILSON, II, and MATTHEW PAULSON, Defendants. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO QUASH Hybrid Athletics, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Hybrid”) and non-party CrossFit, Inc. (“CrossFit”) have moved to quash the third-party subpoena served in August 2018 by Defendant Hylete, LLC (“Hylete”) on CrossFit. Hybrid Athletics, LLC’s Notice of Motion to Quash Subpoena to Non- Party CrossFit, Inc. to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API