Legal Opinion
Twin City Monorail, Inc. v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1984No. 82-2431PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Robbins & Myers, Inc. (Robbins & Myers), appeals from an order entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota granting a motion filed by Twin City Monorail, Inc. (Twin City), to compel arbitration of their contract dispute. For reversal Robbins & Myers argues that the district court erred in granting the motion to compel arbitration because whether the arbitration clause was intended to cover the particular dispute was in issue. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
On November 6, 1981, Robbins & Myers contracted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. City of Cedar Rapids, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 139 v. Carl A. Morse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cummings v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Horsey v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Ex Parte Warrior Basin Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Gelco Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Baker Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Gelco Corporation v. Baker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Medcam, Inc. v. McncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.