Legal Opinion
Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo
California Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1984No. L.A. 31777PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
Pardee Construction Company (Pardee) appeals from an order of the superior court denying Pardee’s request for a “restraining order” to enjoin the City of Camarillo (the city) from applying a growth control ordinance (Camarillo Mun. Code, ch. 1, tit. 20, §§ 20.04-20.13) to Pardee’s *467property.1 The question is whether application of the ordinance is precluded by an earlier consent judgment entered into between Pardee and the city.
I
In the spring of 1970, Pardee purchased about 1,150 acres in an unincorporated area of Ventura County, adjacent to the city. In the fall of 1970 the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hazon-Iny Development, Inc. v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Larsen v. BeekmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Stevens v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Art Movers, Inc. v. Ni West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- 108 HOLDINGS, LTD. v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- L.J. Stephens G. Maxine Stephens v. City of Vista Orbee Mihalek Gloria E. McClellan Robert C. K. FooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.