Englehart v. Westmoreland Water Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Arnold, J.,
The plaintiffs filed a bill in equity to enjoin a continuing trespass. The court below sustained the preliminary objections to the bill, and the plaintiffs appealed.
The bill averred that the defendant, without any right or authority, was maintaining a water line on plaintiffs’ land, and that the defendant “has no right, title, claim or interest in said land [concerning the water line].” We consider this pleading to be a good averment that the defendant is a trespasser. While to some extent it is a legal conclusion, there is no other way that the plaintiffs can plead that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williamsport R. Co. v. Phila. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Western Pennsylvania Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Speer v. Monongahela Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Buffalo, New York & Philadelphia Railroad v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Drum v. DinkelackerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hohnstock Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961