Legal Opinion

Englehart v. Westmoreland Water Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1949No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Arnold, J.,

The plaintiffs filed a bill in equity to enjoin a continuing trespass. The court below sustained the preliminary objections to the bill, and the plaintiffs appealed.

The bill averred that the defendant, without any right or authority, was maintaining a water line on plaintiffs’ land, and that the defendant “has no right, title, claim or interest in said land [concerning the water line].” We consider this pleading to be a good averment that the defendant is a trespasser. While to some extent it is a legal conclusion, there is no other way that the plaintiffs can plead that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamsport R. Co. v. Phila. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Western Pennsylvania Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Speer v. Monongahela Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Buffalo, New York & Philadelphia Railroad v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Drum v. DinkelackerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hohnstock Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API