Legal Opinion

Drum v. Dinkelacker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 17PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiffs filed a bill in equity alleging that there had for over thirty years existed an alley, or right-of-way, along the line between their lot and that of the defendant, partly upon land of each, and used in common by the owners and occupiers of the respective lots. They complain that the defendant had recently moved a garage on to the alley and was also obstructing the alley with lumber, ashes and other material. They prayed for a preliminary injunction' against further encroachment and obstruction, a final decree for removal and restoration, and for damages.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kieffer v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Grace Methodist Episcopal Church v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Smith & Fleek's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Rhea v. ForsythSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  5. Drum v. DinkelackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heffley v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Overly v. HixsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Klavon v. TindallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Englehart v. Westmoreland Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Tresca v. SchuppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API