Legal Opinion

Friolo v. Frankel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 17, 2003No. 75, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

Maryland statutes permit a court, in certain actions to collect wages allegedly due an employee or former employee, to award “reasonable counsel fees” to the plaintiff if he or she is successful in the action. The issue before us is whether, in calculating such fees, the court is required to use what has become known as the “lodestar” approach — that is, to start by multiplying the reasonable number of hours expended by the attorney on the litigation by a reasonable hourly rate and then to consider appropriate adjustments to the product of that multiplication. 1

We shall hold generally that,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Newell v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Campusano v. Lusitano Construction LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API