People v. Gomez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*253Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Here defendant seized property from the victim’s business while the victim was not present. The victim arrived on the scene before defendant departed and followed him as he was leaving. As the victim followed, defendant shot at him. Did defendant commit a robbery? Yes.
I. Facts and Procedural History
Shortly before 5:00 a.m. on January 12, 2004, defendant broke into an Anaheim restaurant. After covering two surveillance cameras with duct tape, he pried open and took money from an ATM in the lobby. He then went to the manager’s office on the second floor. He forced open the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.