Legal Opinion

People v. Gomez

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2008No. S140612PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*253Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here defendant seized property from the victim’s business while the victim was not present. The victim arrived on the scene before defendant departed and followed him as he was leaving. As the victim followed, defendant shot at him. Did defendant commit a robbery? Yes.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Shortly before 5:00 a.m. on January 12, 2004, defendant broke into an Anaheim restaurant. After covering two surveillance cameras with duct tape, he pried open and took money from an ATM in the lobby. He then went to the manager’s office on the second floor. He forced open the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API