Wilcox Trux, Inc. v. Rosenberger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 209 N.W. 308, 211 N.W. 822. Action on two promissory notes made by the defendant to the H.E. Wilcox Motor Company, one for $1,000 dated June 17, 1914, and one for $1,500 dated September 9, 1914, each due two years after its date. These notes were given for stock of the motor company. The defense was fraud of the corporation inducing the purchase of the stock and a timely rescission by the defendant. The plaintiff denied the fraud, claimed that the rescission was not timely, and by supplemental reply pleaded a determination by the U.S. district court of Minnesota as a bar. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Watson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Willard v. OstranderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Moore v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Gibson v. GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Simonds v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.