Legal Opinion

Harrah v. Montour Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1936No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff was a passenger in his own car, driven by a minor son, when it was struck by one of defendant’s trains at a highway crossing. His suit in trespass to recover damages for loss and injuries sustained resulted in a verdict for defendant, and from the overruling of his motion for a new trial he has taken the present appeal. The errors assigned relate to the admission of evidence and to the charge of the court.

In defendant’s case, one of the doctors at the hospital to which both plaintiff and his son were taken following the accident was permitted to testify,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poluski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Zavodnick v. Rose SonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Scheer v. MelvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Holmes' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. CommanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. BloseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Wilson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Stevens v. Reading Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API