Connecticut, Department of Social Services v. Hultman (In Re Hultman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
This single ruling deals with two motions for summary judgment filed by the State of Connecticut, Department of Social Services (“DSS”) in mirror-image complaints brought against each debtor — Barry Wayne Hultman (“Barry”) and Dorothy Hultman (“Dorothy”) (together “the Hult-mans”). The issue raised by the motions, i.e. the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel, is identical in each complaint, as indicated by the Hultmans filing, in effect, a single joint response to the motions.
II
Barry filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York v. Khouri (In Re Khouri)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2008