Legal Opinion

Connecticut, Department of Social Services v. Hultman (In Re Hultman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 24, 2001No. 19-30236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

This single ruling deals with two motions for summary judgment filed by the State of Connecticut, Department of Social Services (“DSS”) in mirror-image complaints brought against each debtor — Barry Wayne Hultman (“Barry”) and Dorothy Hultman (“Dorothy”) (together “the Hult-mans”). The issue raised by the motions, i.e. the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel, is identical in each complaint, as indicated by the Hultmans filing, in effect, a single joint response to the motions.

II

Barry filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York v. Khouri (In Re Khouri)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API