Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Sproul
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided August 9, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00231Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 22-CV-231-SMY ) WARDEN DAN SPROUL, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: Petitioner Albert C. Burgess, Jr. filed this habeas corpus action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241
to challenge the conditions of his confinement. Burgess asserts that he is not housed in the proper unit, that other inmates assaulted him, and that he has been denied medical care (Doc. 1). He concludes, “This is a claim under the 8th Amendment.”
Id.
The case is now before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Rudolph Lucien v. Diane JockischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Ammons v. GerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Thomas Sloan v. Lawrence LeszaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.