Legal Opinion
Rudolph Lucien v. Diane Jockisch
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 7, 1998No. 96-2450PublishedCited by 900 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Rudolph Lucien, a prisoner currently incarcerated at Stateville Correctional Center, attempted to sue a prison official who had transferred him to a different prison. Lucien alleged that the transfer was in retaliation for earlier litigation commenced by Lucien against the official. The district court denied Lueien’s petition to proceed informa pauperis (IFP); dismissed his complaint as time-barred; and barred him from proceeding IFP in the future pursuant to the “three-strikes” provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). For the reasons…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- David Newlin v. David W. Helman, Jesse E. Robinson v. B. Smith, James C. Griffin v. William R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Thurman v. GramleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by900 opinions
- Andrews v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Casey Dooley v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Raymond W. Snider v. Dr. MelindezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Canell v. LightnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Ashafa v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
895 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.