Legal Opinion

George v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 1931No. 28,288PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

The defendant's motion for a reargument was granted. It was submitted on briefs.

5. Article 23(a) of the rules, conceded, for the purpose of this appeal only, to be a valid contract between the railroad and its firemen and enginemen, provides that a fireman shall not be dismissed from service without just cause or before being given a hearing. In paragraph two of the former opinion we referred to the call of the plaintiff to immediate service when he was on the board but not in actual service, as he was returning from 12 hours' work as a plumber; and his claim that without rest he was unfit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loyhed v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Hackney v. AdamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Holmes v. IgoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Virginian Ry. Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Grubbs v. SchulzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API