Holmes v. Igo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal from a judgment of a justice court to the municipal court of St. Paul. The proceedings in the municipal court are stated in the first paragraph of the-opinion. From the judgment of affirmance, entered pursuant to the order of Iíanft, J., defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtFrown, J.
This action was commenced in justice court, where plaintiff had judgment for $95 and the costs, and defendants appealed to the municipal court of the city of St. Paul upon questions of .both law and fact. Judgment was rendered by the justice on the twenty-third of January, 1909. Defendants’ appeal was perfected and allowed on the second day of February, 1909. Keturn was made to the municipal court, and appellants noticed and caused the action to be placed upon the calendar for trial at a term of the municipal court commencing on the twenty-third of February. When called in its order,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. YagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Stolt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Loyhed v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Graham v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Rogers v. LoopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Industrial Loan Thrift Corporation v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- State ex rel. Grubbs v. SchulzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Altergott Furn. Co. v. O'ConnorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wentworth v. National Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Stein v. CavenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.