Longley, Low & Alexander v. Amazon Hosiery Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon; Russell, J. Bill by Longley, Low & Alexander against the Amazon Hosiery Company, the Amazon Knitting Company, Charles H. Hackley, and Thomas Hume, to establish a right to share in the assets of an insolvent debtor. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
On and prior to March 25, 1898, the Amazon Hosiery Company was engaged in the manufacturing business at Muskegon. It was a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, but its plant was located, and its entire business carried on, at Muskegon, excepting that it maintained a business office in Chicago. On March 25th it was indebted to the defendants Hackley *195and Hume, directly and indirectly, — that is, on debts to them, and on debts to others upon which they were collaterally responsible, — in a very large amount, approximately $150,000. It was indebted to others in a large amount.
On the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Kendall v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Sheldon v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- National Bank v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Charles Maloney & Co. v. GonhueMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Charles Maloney & Co. v. GonhueMichigan Supreme Court · 1908