Legal Opinion

Charles Maloney & Co. v. Gonhue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1908No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error t,o Delta; Stone, J. Garnishment proceedings by Charles Maloney & Company against the public schools of Escanaba as garnishee of Leonard Gonhue. Charles H. Norton and others intervened as claimants of the fund. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and the claimants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The public schools in Escanaba were indebted to Leonard Gonhue, who in turn was a debtor of the plaintiff and several other persons, among whom was a firm known as Norton Brothers. He gave to Norton Brothers a written order in the following words:

“Escanaba, Mich., Nov. 4, 1905. “Board op Education,
“City:
“Please pay to Norton Brothers, or order, the sum of Five Hundred and Forty-two Dollars, and charge the same to my account, and oblige.
“Leonard Gonhue.”

The money was due upon a contract for building.

The plaintiff attempted to reach this money by garnishment proceedings, and, being permitted to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tiemeyer v. . TurnquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Builders' & Painters' Supply Co. v. Lucas & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Knapp v. . McGowanNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Kendall v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown, Eager & Hull Co. v. MosierMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Meier v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wheeler v. Ocker & Ford Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API