Legal Opinion
Kleiber v. City of Idaho Falls
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1986No. 15758PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing the complaint of appellant Kleiber who sought damages under the theories of common law tort and a violation of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 which allegedly resulted from the city’s refusal to allow Kleiber to operate a mobile hot dog stand on the sidewalks of downtown Idaho Falls. We affirm.
In May 1982 Kleiber applied to the city of Idaho Falls for a business license to operate a'mobile hot dog stand in downtown Idaho Falls. Kleiber indicated that he was unsure where his stand would be located but…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Hamilton v. RybarIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Hamilton v. RybarIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Kleiber v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.