Legal Opinion

Infanger v. City of Salmon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2002No. 25843Published

1Opinion of the Court

44 P.3d 1100 (2002)

137 Idaho 45

Ray E. INFANGER and Vera S. Infanger, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Respondents,

v.

The CITY OF SALMON, The City Council of the City of Salmon, Defendants-Respondents-Cross Appellants, and

Charles E. Bender and Denise Bender, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 25843.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, May 2001 Term.

January 17, 2002.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 2002.

Jim Jones & Associates, Boise, for appellants. Jim Jones argued.

Holden, Kidwell, Hahn & Crapo, PLLC, Idaho Falls, for respondents-cross appellants City of Salmon. Dale W. Storer…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Tommerup v. Albertson's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. KTVB, INC. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API