Legal Opinion

Miller v. Greiner

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1964No. S. F. 21592PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Petitioners, electors and taxpayers of the City of San Jose, seek a writ of mandate to prevent the city clerk of San Jose from holding a special election on April 14, 1964, and from expending city funds for such election.

The sole issue turns upon whether, as a result of the 1963 amendments to the Charter of the City of San Jose, the election of the city manager may be held in even-numbered years or whether it must be held in odd-numbered years in conjunction with the general municipal election. For the reasons set forth below we have concluded that the election must be conducted in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Stillwell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jolicoeur v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van De KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Burrey v. Embarcadero Municipal Improvement DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Arntz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API