D'Urso v. Wildheim
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ST AMOS
delivered the opinion of the court:
This appeal is from an order sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff presents three contentions in seeking a reversal and remandment of the trial court’s order: (1) certain procedural defects in defendant’s pleadings should prevent him from raising the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense; (2) the conduct of defendant’s liability insurer estops defendant from asserting this affirmative defense; and (3) as an alternative to the second contention, the issue of estoppel raised a question…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kinsey v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Flagler v. WessmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Suing v. CattonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anthony Koclanakis, Doing Business as Pan-Olympian Travel Agency v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Davis v. WeiskopfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Myers v. Centralia Cartage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Loughman Cabinet Co. v. C. Iber & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.