Legal Opinion

Emily Attmore v. Carolyn Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2016No. 13-36048PublishedCited by 330 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIOÑ

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

A Social Security disability benefits claimant is no longer entitled to benefits when substantial evidence demonstrates (1) “there has been any medical improvement in the [claimant’s] impairment” and (2) the claimant “is now able to engage in substantial gainful activity.” 42 U-S.C. § 423(f)(1). To determine whether there has been medical improvement, an administrative law judge (ALJ) must “compare the current medical severity” of the claimant’s impairment to the medical severity of the impairment “at the time of the most recent favorable medical decision that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by330 opinions

  1. Brenda Diedrich v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Anderson v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  3. Brenda Diedrich v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Roberts v. Acting Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  5. Sorber v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019

325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API