United Carolina Bank v. Martocci
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this Opinion, we are called upon to determine whether the trial court properly granted the appellees’, Domenic and Helen Martocci’s, preliminary objection which asserted that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appellant-bank’s, United Carolina Bank’s, petition to fix the fair market value of property located in North Carolina brought pursuant to the Deficiency Judgment Act, 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8103 et seq. We affirm.
The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. On July 18, 1989, the appellees, residents of Pennsylvania, borrowed $104,000.00…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tops Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Stewart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hafer v. SchauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Barndt v. BarndtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Farley v. McDonnell Douglas Truck Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re Estate of CantorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. StaatsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. SpanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.