Legal Opinion

Schick v. Lerner

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1987No. B024429PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Peter M. Schick instituted this action against defendants Richard Lerner, Roger Bach, and Sheila Mickelson, among others, seeking damages for the alleged wrongful disclosure of certain confidential information. Following plaintiff’s filing of a third amended complaint, the trial court struck certain allegations contained therein (see Code Civ. Proc., §§ 435, 436), sustained Lerner’s demurrer thereto, and entered an order of dismissal as to that defendant only (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. (f)). This appeal follows. We affirm.

The pertinent allegations of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Skarbrevik v. Cohen, England & WhitfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Sooy v. PeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API