Legal Opinion

Sooy v. Peter

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1990No. A047652PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

In this appeal we consider whether a defendant, who has been forced to defend a lawsuit precipitated by the negligence of the plaintiff’s counsel, is entitled to recover from the negligent lawyer attorney fees and costs incurred in defending the lawsuit. We conclude that the defendant is not entitled to such compensation in this case.

Facts

The issue on appeal arises from a foreclosure sale of real property located in Napa County. San Francisco Federal Savings and Loan held the first deed of trust on the property and was represented in the foreclosure by its attorney,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mega RV Corporation v. HWH CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Sindell v. Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Third Eye Blind, Inc. v. Near North Entertainment Insurance Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Burger v. KuimelisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API