Novelty Import Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
The merchandise of these three protests, consolidated for trial, consists of cigarette holders, approximately 131/4 inches in length, product of Japan. Two of the protest invoices describe the article as a ‘Cigarette Kisseru.” The third protest invoice describes it as a “Smoking Cigarette Holder.” The collector classified these articles as cigarette holders under paragraph 1552 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and assessed duty at 2y2 cents each and 15 per centum ad valorem, which is the modified rate prescribed in the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- W. Kay Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. DunhillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- M. Pressner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
3Cited by3 opinions
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Clarendon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986