Legal Opinion

W. Kay Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 14, 1964No. C.D. 2484PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KiciiardsoN, Judge:

Tbe merchandise involved in this case consists of teacups and saucers, imported from Japan in 1958, and assessed with duty as decorated china tableware at 60 or 45 per centum ad val-orem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, TJD. 51802, or the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, TJD. 53865, effective September 10, 1955, T.D. 53877. It is claimed that the merchandise is not tableware and is properly dutiable under said paragraph…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United China & Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. A. Jaller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Protest 26884-K of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Protests 102171-K of Ignaz Strauss & Co.United States Customs Court · 1945

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Arnart Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Brechner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API