Slingerland v. Corwin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Anna 0. Slingerland' and others, from an order of the Supreme Uourt, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 18tli day of January, 1905, directing the plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars.
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, J. :
The action is in form ejectment, but the plaintiffs allege as the reason why they are entitled to immediate possession of the real property in controversy, that the defendants have so materially violated various conditions of a lease, under which they have long occupied, that they were and are entitled to no renewal thereof or to continue to occupy thereunder, and that the lease in fact has not been renewed.
*311The court properly directed the plaintiffs to furnish the defendants with a bill of particulars; but the order is much too broad. It is not the office of a bill of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morrill v. KazisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dwyer v. SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Sundheimer v. James S. Barron & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
- Steinleger v. FrankelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1922
- Adams v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1921
- Chisolm v. StrausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.