Chisolm v. Straus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Isidor Strans and another, copartners doing business under the firm name of R. H. Maey & Co., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Rew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the County of Rew York . on the 31st day of October, 1905, denying the defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars. . . .
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, J.:
The- plaintiff brings this action, to recover the’value-of certain articles claimed, to have beén" unlawfully removed from premises belonging'-to her by the defendants ’upon vacating as .tenants, and resultant damages to her freehold from such removal. This the defendants denied, and demanded that the plaintiff furnish a bill of particulars, specifying "the character and quantity of such .articles and their claimed value, as well as the precise damage to the freehold complained of. .- -
■The record discloses, that upon the defendants’ removal from- the premises they- advertised to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Slingerland v. CorwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905