Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 26, 2007No. 6:06-cv-00798PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LAZZARA, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and exhibits (dkt. 43) and Plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition thereto with exhibits (dkt. 50).

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party, there is no genuine issue for trial. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986) (citation omitted). On a motion for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Hara Ex Rel. H.O. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Morgan v. Ford Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Priester v. CromerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Beaty v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API