United States v. Virgilio Patricio Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Flores was convicted under the Federal Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922(e)1 2, for failing to provide written no*1500tice to a carrier before shipping firearms. Appellant contends that (1) the notice requirement violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and (2) the district court erred in holding that the offense does not require proof of specific intent. We reject appellant’s contentions and affirm.2
I. BACKGROUND
Beginning in early February, 1982, appellant began discussing the purchase of twenty-two revolvers with a gun shop…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Kevin J. SherbondyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. PitroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. H. Thomas FehnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.