United States v. Pitrone
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This harlequinade requires us to examine a matter of first impression: the degree of scienter needed for a felony conviction under 16 U.S.C. § 707(b) (1994), a part of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Detecting no reversible error in the district court’s rejection of the defendant’s proffered jury instruction or in any other respect, we affirm the judgment of conviction.
I. THE STATUTORY SCHEME
In 1916, the United States and Great Britain (acting for Canada) negotiated a treaty to protect migratory birds. See Convention for the Protection of Migratory Birds in the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- United States v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Guillemard-Ginorio v. Contreras-GomezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. Marrero-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Ngai Man LeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.