Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoaglin
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
Decided February 27, 1981No. NCM 80 0897PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Senior Judge:
Appellant pled guilty pursuant to a pretrial agreement. Now, after conviction, sentencing and mitigation of the sentence by the convening authority through suspension of the bad-conduct discharge in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain, appellant asserts that the military judge erred by failing to satisfy himself that his understanding of each provision of the agreement was the same as appellant’s. In support of this assignment, appellant cites United States v. Green, 1 MJ 453 (CMA 1976); United States v. King, 3 MJ 458 (CMA 1977); and United States v. Williamson,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. ElmoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. KraffaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. CassityU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. LibecapU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. SawinskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. AmparoU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. ParkerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.