Legal Opinion

Hartwig Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1934No. 24764PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The authority relied upon for the diversion of funds complained of is Section 130 of the Municipal Code of the city of Cleveland, which confers upon the Commissioner of Water the charge and management of all plants of the city for furnishing water to its inhabitants, and for the use of others to whom it may be sold, and then provides:

“The operation of sewage disposal plants shall be treated and construed as being part of the operation of water purification.”

Whatever may have been the ulterior motive prompting the enactment of that provision, its ultimate result is to take monies from the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Maryville v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Himebaugh v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. City of Lakewood v. ReesOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. City of Franklin v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API