Legal Opinion
Meeropol v. Nizer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1973No. 73 Civ. 2720PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TYLER, District Judge.
By order to show cause filed on June 21, 1973, plaintiffs have moved for an order restraining defendants pendente lite from infringing upon their claimed copyright in the letters of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and from publishing, selling or disposing of copies of the book entitled The Implosion Conspiracy, written by the defendant Nizer and publish ed by the defendant Doubleday & Company, Inc. (“Doubleday”). 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 112; Rule 65, F.R.Civ.P. The motion for temporary injunctive relief was heard by the court on June 29, 1973. For reasons to be discussed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc. And John KeatsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Irving Berlin v. E. C. Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Time Incorporated v. Bernard Geis AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Life Music, Inc. v. Wonderland Music CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Pocket Books, Inc. v. Dell Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Michael Meeropol and Robert Meeropol v. Louis Nizer, Doubleday & Co., Inc. And Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Michael Meeropol and Robert Meeropol v. Louis Nizer and Doubleday & Co., Inc., and Fawcett Publications, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Showcase Atlanta Cooperative Productions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- Rohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Meeropol v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.