Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Grode

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1999No. B122777PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

Plaintiff Herbert Hanson appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Dr. Marshall Grode, Dr. Robert Scott Pashman, and West Coast Spine Institute. We reverse.

Standard of Review

Summary judgment is appropriate if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).)

“ ‘A defendant seeking summary judgment has met the burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Kelley v. TrunkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Powell v. KleinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. George v. Sonoma County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Avivi v. Centro Medico Urgente Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Megargee v. WittmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API