Legal Opinion

Megargee v. Wittman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 19, 2008No. CV F 06-0684 LJO GSAPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY JUDGMENT DECISION

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants County of Tulare (“County”), the County’s Sheriff, and two County Sheriffs Department deputies seek summary judgment/adjudication on plaintiffs’ excessive force and negligence claims arising from a shooting following a high speed chase. Defendants contend that plaintiffs lack sufficient evidence to support their claims. Plaintiffs respond that factual disputes and differing versions of the events preclude summary judgment/adjudication. This Court considered defendants’ summary judgment/adjudication motion on…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Knapps v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  3. Arias v. AmadorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  4. Roy v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. BARSAMIAN v. City of KingsburgDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API