Legal Opinion

Jayne v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1991No. 917 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Michael Jayne (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which suspended Claimant’s benefits based on a referee’s decision that Claimant refused an offer of employment within the medical limitations of his disability.

In the course of his employment with King Fifth Wheel (Employer), Claimant sustained an injury to his back and received workmen’s compensation benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. In a letter Claimant received on November 17, 1987, Employer offered Claimant a lab technician position (Position) beginning on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Magayna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Korol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. North Pittsburgh Drywall Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API