Legal Opinion

Ragoss v. Cuming County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1893No. 5055PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the district court of Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

In 1881 Ragoss was elected county clerk of Cuming county and held the office for four years. The county board settled with him from time to time, and so far as appears he settled in full when he left the office. Afterwards this action was brought on his official bond to recover fees collected by him while in office. The fees claimed are as. follows:

Schedule “A.” — Fees Entered Upon Fee Book.

1882.

For recording deeds.................................... $656 Off

For recording mortgages............ 381 05

For filing chattel mortgages.......................... 52 05

For recording…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bayha v. County of WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bush v. Johnson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mecom v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Heald v. Polk CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mitchell v. County of ClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Sioux County v. JamesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API