Legal Opinion

Sioux County v. Jameson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1895No. 5749PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the district court of Sioux county. Tried below before Bartow, J. cited: Hamlin v. Meadville, 6 Neb., 227; Rogers v. Walsh, 12 Neb., 28; City of Blair v. Lantry, 21 Neb., 259; Cuming County v. Tate, 10 Neb., 195; State v. Dixon County, 24 Neb., 106. cited: Richardson County v. Hull, 24 Neb., 536; Brown v. Otoe County, 6 Neb., Ill; Clark v. Dayton, 6 Neb., 192; Ragoss v. Cuming County, 36 Neb., 375.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

It appears from the record that the defendant was, during the years of 1887, 1888, and 1889, county clerk of Sioux county; that he had, when it was necessary in the performance of the duties of his office, employed and paid an assistant, or clerk, and presented bills for the amounts paid such clerk or assistant to the county commissioners in the shape of claims, which were allowed, and warrants drawn on, and paid from, the general fund. The claims so allowed and paid amounted in the aggregate to $98. To recover such amount the plaintiff instituted this action in the county court of Sioux…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State ex rel. Ensey v. ChurchillNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ragoss v. Cuming CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Heald v. Polk CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mitchell v. County of ClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Stenberg v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hazelet v. Holt CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API