Legal Opinion

Threadgill v. Fagan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1933No. 4070PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Defendant in error, herein called appellee, filed a petition in two counts against plaintiffs in error, herein called appellants, who are husband and wife. The first was in trespass to try title for two lots in the city of Amarillo. The second count was upon an indebtedness of $555.55 evidenced by a note and alleged to be secured by a valid and subsisting lien on the same property described in the first count.

The petition, in substance and effect, alleges in its second count that this lien arose by virtue of certain payments made at the instance and request of appellants to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Platte v. Securities Inv. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Tennison v. DoniganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Bustamante v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Williams v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Getzwiller v. FergesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Lov Vorn v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Lov Vorn v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API