Legal Opinion

Lov Vorn v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1937No. 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

The plaintiff, P. H. Lov Vorn, alleged, in substance, that he entered into an oral agreement with A. J. Wilkinson, by which plaintiff, for a consideration of $6,200, agreed to erect for Wilkinson certain improvements consisting of a filling station, tourist cabin, and coffee shop; that, before the foundation of the first building was completed, the original contract was wholly abandoned and a new agreement entered into, by which plaintiff was to erect other and different improvements on the same lots and that no agreement was made as to the price to be paid by Wilkinson for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Garza v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Threadgill v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API