Legal Opinion

Bustamante v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1932No. 8895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The case involves distinct land titles running back through the last hundred years to two grants originally issued by the government of the republic of Mexico to Antonio Zapata and Pedro Bustamante, respectively. The grants lie contiguously in Zapata county, and are known as the Villa and Las Confit-as, respectively. Each embraces five leagues of land, but this suit directly concerns only 20,000 acres thereof, approximately, lying together under one fence.

Appellees claim and recovered a segregated two-fifths interest in the Confitas, amounting to 7,076.5 acres, and 12,252.37 acres in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. BustamenteTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Gavin v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. McMath Co. v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Ditmar v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API