Legal Opinion
Carranza v. FRAAS
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 2011No. Civil Action 05-0117 (RMU)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs in this case are two female farmers who hired the defendant, attorney Phillip Fraas, to represent them in a civil rights action against the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). After settlement negotiations with the USDA ultimately failed, the plaintiffs commenced this action against Fraas for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, claiming that the defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Arrington, Derreck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Agelli v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Edwards v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Marbury Law Group, Pllc v. CarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013