Legal Opinion

Telink, Inc. Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. United States of America, County of Fresno, County of San Diego, Intervenors-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-50034PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge BEEZER.

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Two corporate defendants petitioned the district court for a writ of error coram nobis, alleging that the indictment to which they pled nolo contendere failed to state a criminal offense. The corporations sought dismissal of the indictment and return of restitution and monetary fines. The district court denied the petition on a theory of lach-es and, alternatively, on the conclusion that certain counts in the indictment continued to state a criminal offense. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

I

Telink, Inc. (“Telink”), a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Paul J. Foont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Thomas R. Beaty and Nancy Z. Beaty, Debtors, Thomas R. Beaty v. David SelingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API