Telink, Inc. Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. United States of America, County of Fresno, County of San Diego, Intervenors-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BEEZER.
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Two corporate defendants petitioned the district court for a writ of error coram nobis, alleging that the indictment to which they pled nolo contendere failed to state a criminal offense. The corporations sought dismissal of the indictment and return of restitution and monetary fines. The district court denied the petition on a theory of lach-es and, alternatively, on the conclusion that certain counts in the indictment continued to state a criminal offense. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
Telink, Inc. (“Telink”), a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Paul J. Foont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re Thomas R. Beaty and Nancy Z. Beaty, Debtors, Thomas R. Beaty v. David SelingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.