People v. Anderson
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of bribing a witness and dispensing dangerous drugs. He was also adjudicated to be an habitual criminal. Defendant appeals the convictions, the adjudication, and the sentence. We affirm.
The prosecution’s case consisted primarily of the testimony of one Phillip Freeman, who had been arrested for using drugs in violation of the terms of his probation. In return for this testimony, Freeman was granted immunity.
I
At trial, defense counsel attempted to cross-examine Freeman concerning certain testimony about defendant which Freeman had previously given before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pearson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- People v. PickettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Casias v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- State v. SalazarIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SearsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. MontoyaColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GaskinsColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.