Legal Opinion

Ehlers v. Colonial Penn Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1977No. 75-669PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are presented on appeal:

1. Did the plaintiff give notice of the accident as soon as practical?

2. Did the plaintiff rebut the presumption of prejudice which results from untimely notice?

3. Did the defendant’s disclaimer of liability relieve the plaintiff of the requirement to submit proofs of loss?

Notice of Accident

The parties do not dispute the fact that the defendant was not notified of the accident which caused the plain tiff’s injuries until March 7, 1974 — a lapse of almost twelve and one-half months after the accident. What the parties do dispute, however, is whether…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Resseguie v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hart v. Fraternal AllianceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Allen v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API