Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Bill by Thomas Smith and others against the city of . Detroit to restrain the collection of an assessment in a street-opening proceeding. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

December 31, 1894, a petition was filed by the defendant to condemn property for the opening and extending of Mack avenue from Collins street to McDougall avenue. A verdict from a jury having been obtained, the verdict was confirmed, and the amount was certified to the common council. On April 6, 1897, the common council adopted a resolution fixing an assessment district, determining that the lands within the district were benefited by the opening of Mack avenue, and that there be levied the sum of. $5,618.33, in proportion, as near as may be, to the advantage which each lot or parcel is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scotten v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Borgman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brown v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Voigt v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Phipps v. MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Goodrich v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Murray v. La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Olson v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API